Research is an ongoing process in which people keep asking new questions and looking for new answers.
While the concept of the this frame is good, in practice there are issues with it's place in the Framework. For example:
1) Based on the description, it overlaps with other frames to a very great extent. See the How does it relate to other frames? tab for more details. While all of the other frames do overlap in places, each still has a distinct kernel that separates it from the others. That distinct kernel seems to be missing from Research as Inquiry-- just about every aspect of it is also covered somewhere else.
2) There seems to be a disconnect between the description of the frame and its knowledge practices. The description focus on the idea that research is ongoing and open ended. It talks a lot about how questions are developed and built upon over time both in academia and the world at large. After reading those descriptions, the attached knowledge practices don’t really focus on that big picture-- they are very concrete and hands-on and clearly related to students working on their own research papers/projects (scope, research methods, organizing/synthesizing/drawing conclusions from information).
Because of these two issues, this frame does not seem to be as cohesive or clear as the other frames.
Research as Inquiry has an extremely close connection to Scholarship as Conversation. This is especially noticeable in the first three sentences of the elaboration, which talks about "problems or questions in a discipline or between disciplines that are open or unresovled." It then mentions "collaborative effort" and the how "points of disagreement," "debate and dialogue," and "conversations" play a role in the research process. The wording is strikingly similar what is found in Scholarship as Conversation.
Then there is a second close tie with Searching as Strategic Exploration. Research as Inquiry also focuses on research as an iterative process. It's dispositions focus on the need to keep an open mind, try multiple approaches, be flexible and persistent, and ask for help. These same concepts appear in both the description and the dispositions of Searching as Strategic Exploration.
The knowledge practices are distinct for the most part, but don't have a close tie to the description of the frame.
All the first four Standards have either entire performance indicators our individual outcomes that tie into Research as Inquiry. The reason is that the frame's performance indicators cover both developing/revising research projects and using information in those projects. Those issues were a real focus of the Standards, so there are a great many indicators/outcomes that map to a handful of knowledge practices in the frame. Research as Inquiry also has very broad dispositions related to being flexible and keeping an open mind during research and many outcomes can also be linked to those.
This frame is not suited to multiple-choice assessment. Neither the focus on the open-ended and iterative nature of research, nor the knowledge practices on scope/research methods/organizing and synthesizing information lend themselves to those types of questions. However, here are some suggestions:
Students will be able to identify strong research questions.
Students will be able to match research methods to their descriptions.
Students will be able to describe research methods that are commonly used in discipline X. See also Scholarship as Conversation.
Students will be able to give examples of how research is an iterative process that develops over time.
Students will be able to synthesize information and draw reasonable conclusions from sources.
Students will be able to develop initial research questions/scope of investigation. (See research plan rubric.)
Students will be able to identify gaps or weaknesses in their own research.
Students will be able to develop initial research questions/scope of investigation.
Students will be able to select research method(s) appropriate to assignment and topic. For upper-level and graduate classes.
Students will be able to revise research questions/scope based on initial results of the research process.
Students will be able to follow multiple lines of investigation.
Students will be able to exhibit flexibility and persistence during the search process. See under Searching as Strategic Exploration.
Students will be able to incorporate information from sources into their own work.
Students will be able to synthesize information and draw reasonable conclusions.
Students will be able to locate information sources that are a good match to their topic. See under Searching as Strategic Exploration.